English Contract Law - The offeror may withdraw it.
Before an offer is accepted, the offeror is free to withdraw it. The offeror is obligated to do so, however, if the offeree and the offeror have agreed to keep the offer open for a particular period of time. Revocation needs to be announced For a withdrawal of a bilateral offer to be effective, the offeree must be informed. It doesn't matter whether the offeror or a third party informs the offeree of the revocation. The revocation of offers is not subject to the postal acceptance regulation. Revocation of unilateral offers is subject to different regulations.
English Contract Law – Termination of an offer.
An offer that has been canceled cannot be accepted again. An offeree may want to inquire about the offer without rejecting it by making a counteroffer, or an offeror may want to withdraw an offer due to a change in the circumstances.
English Contract Law - Forms of acceptance for unilateral offers
When accepting a unilateral offer, there are different guidelines than when accepting a bilateral offer. The main distinction is that a unilateral offer is accepted by the offeree through conduct rather than communication, and this acceptance results in a binding agreement between the parties.
English Contract Law - Receipt through email and Website
The receipt rule is thought to apply in general.
receipt Rule : The requirement that for an acceptance to be valid, the offeror must really receive it.
Accepting via a website
The order and acknowledgement of receipt of order will be assumed to be received when the parties to whom they are addressed are able to view them, unless the parties are companies and agree otherwise.
English Contract Law - Instantaneous communications delivered after hours
If the acceptance is sent after "normal business hours," it will be assumed to have been received the next working day.
English Contract Law - Instant communications sent during business hours
If the acceptance is delivered to a company when it is open for business, it is presumed to have been delivered when the fax was really received.
English Contract Law - Instantaneous media, including the telephone, fax and telex.
Instant communication methods include the phone, fax, and telex. The widespread consensus is that the receipt rule is in effect, meaning that in order for an offer to be communicated, the offeror must actually receive an acceptance. Typically, it is the offeree's responsibility to make sure the offeror has actually received the acceptance. The offeror and offeree are treated as though they were speaking face to face when accepting offers over the phone. Therefore, the acceptance will not have been communicated if the offeror cannot hear or comprehend it. If an acceptance is submitted through fax and the offeror is aware of it, but the acceptance is not received or cannot be read when it is, the offeror must request a new acceptance from the offeree.
English Contract Law - The Postal Acceptance Rule
The postal acceptance rule will be in effect if the offeror and offeree's interactions indicate that the offeree may transmit acceptance through the post. According to the postal acceptance rule, the offeree's acceptance takes effect as soon as it is posted and turns into a binding legal agreement. Therefore, the offeror is still subject to the contract that was established when the acceptance was posted even if he never receives the acceptance. There are conditions that must be met in order for such a strong rule to be applicable, including that the letter of acceptance be properly addressed and mailed through a post office or a Royal Mail mailbox. Letters that are presented to the postman or transmitted via a courier service are exempt from the postal acceptance regulation. The postal acceptance rule may be excluded at the parties' discretion, for example, by the offeror stipulating that an acceptance must not be delivered by mail and by identifying an other form of contact.
English Contract Law - Acceptance procedures for bilateral offers
In this part, we examine how the offeror's specifications for how acceptance should be communicated have an impact. Comparing the legal position for unilateral offers and the stance for bilateral offers
In order to create a legally enforceable contract, it is customary to notify the offeror of an acceptance of a bilateral offer (the receipt rule).
The acceptance must really be received by the offeror in order for it to be valid, according to the receipt rule.
The precept that silence cannot constitute approval is supported by the requirement for communication of acceptance.
Therefore, it is not permissible for an offeror to inform an offeree that he will presume that his offer has been accepted if he hears nothing from him. In other words, a binding contract won't be formed if the offeree doesn't reply to such a communication from the offeror. Regarding the type of acceptance, there are two key factors to take into account: Acceptance must be communicated in the manner indicated by the offeror if it has been stated explicitly or impliedly that acceptance must take a certain form, such as in person. The offeree may use another form of acceptance as long as it is not slower if the offeror has not made it abundantly apparent that it must only be made in a particular form. For instance, if the offeror required acceptance to be made by phone, a physical visit would suffice as a backup, so long as it wasn't noticeably slower. An important exception to the general rule that a bilateral contract's acceptance must be notified in order to be effective is the postal acceptance rule.
English Contract Law - The offeree must accept the offer in its entirety.
If the offeree does something that would typically count as accepting the offer, the action will only count as accepting the offer if the offeree is aware of it. The offeree's reason for doing the action that defines acceptance is unimportant as long as they are aware of the offer. For instance, if a reward of £100 is offered for specific information about a crime, anyone who comes forward with that information will be eligible for the reward as long as they are aware of the crime, even if their primary motivation is not to win the reward but rather to do so for some other reason, such as assuaging their guilt.
Kembara's Legal Infos
Infos about legal issues and legal concepts that are available online .