English Contract Law - Determining whether a pre-contractual remark is a term or a representation using statute
Certain legislation specify the circumstances under which certain precontractual utterances are treated as contract terms. Section 9 of the Consumer Rights Act (CRA) 2015, for example, considers any contract to deliver products to include a provision stating that the quality of the items is sufficient
0 Comments
English Contract Law - The law of parol evidence and pre-contractual statements
The parol evidence rule assumes that when a contract is in writing, it contains all of the contract's terms. Because this is a supposition, it can be refuted under specific conditions. Furthermore, it does not preclude the courts from suggesting provisions into a contract. In practice, parties frequently include an entire agreement provision in contracts, making rebuttal more difficult. An entire agreement provision states that the written agreement comprises all of the terms agreed upon by the parties and that neither party relied on any precontractual assertions. The assumption that if a contract is in writing, all of the provisions are included in writing (Parol Evidence Rule). English Contract Law – What is the difference between a term and a representation in a pre-contractual statement?
Courts examine all relevant facts to determine whether a pre-contractual statement is a term or a representation. The evidence is objectively examined by the courts to determine whether the representor intended to make a legally binding promise that the statement was true, and for that promise to be integrated into the contract. If the courts rule in their favor, the expression will become a term. If they did not, but nonetheless intended for the statement to convince the representee to enter into the contract, the remark will be considered a representation. If the contract is in writing, the courts presume that the parties incorporated all of the terms in the contract, and the longer the period between the statement and the contract, the more likely it was not intended to be a term. In addition, the courts apply the secondary tests listed below to help them determine the intention of the representative. Secondary tests used to assess if a pre-contractual remark is a term or a representation in the interaction between the representor and the representee. Term Representor has special knowledge or expertise on the subject matters of the contract. Representor knows that the representee would not have entered into the contract if pre contractual statements are not made. Representor assumes responsibility for the pre contractual statements Representor did not ask the representee to check / verify the pre contractual statements given. Representation Representor has no special knowledge or expertise on the subject matters of the contract. Representor did not knows that the representee would not have entered into the contract if pre contractual statements are not made. Representor did not assumes responsibility for the pre contractual statements Representor asks the representee to check / verify the pre contractual statements given. \ English Contract Law - How can you know whether a pre-contractual declaration is puff?
The individual who makes the pre-contractual statement is known as the representor. The person to whom the pre-contractual statement is made is known as the representee. In some circumstances, the representative will make grandiose (or flippant) remarks that no reasonable person would take literally or recognize as having the aim to have legal ramifications. Advertisement statements are frequently, but not always a puff.These statements are usually grandiose or flippant in order to catch the attention of the intended audience. A classic example is a sign outside a funfair ride that says, 'Guaranteed to scare your socks off'. According to English law, such remarks have no legal effect because a reasonable person would not accept them literally. In other words, a person could not legally sue a rollercoaster ride based on the preceding sentence if the rollercoaster ride did not scare his socks off. English Contract Law – Terms, Representations and Puff
Before entering into a contract, the parties may exchange numerous oral or written statements. These pre-contractual remarks are classified by the law as terms, representations, and puff. Preliminary agreement A statement made by a party prior to the formation of a contract. term A pre-contractual declaration that comprises a promise that something is true and is incorporated into the contract. representation A pre-contractual declaration that motivates the other party to engage into the contract but is not a commitment that something is true. puff An exaggerated assertion (typically used in commercials) that a reasonable person would recognize as having no legal ramifications. Puffs have no legal ramifications. English Contract Law – What Remedies Can A Contract Promisee Exercise for a Third Party?
We looked into the grounds on which a third party could file a claim under statute or through common law frameworks. However, in some cases, you may come to the conclusion that a third party cannot make a claim in its own name. What does this mean for the third party? To pursue a claim for the third party's loss, the third party must rely on the promisee under the contract. Let us look at this in terms of damages, specific performance, and injunctions. Damages Under English law, a party to a contract cannot sue and collect for the loss of a third party, but there are exceptions. We've already discussed how a trustee can recover for a trust's beneficiary. We will now look at two non-trust relationship exceptions: contracts of convenience and the St Martins Property exemption. Convenience contracts The law recognizes that one person may engage into a contract with another person for the sake of convenience, both on his own behalf and on behalf of others. Family vacations, ordering restaurant meals for a party, and hiring a taxi for a group are all good instances. In these restricted situations, the individual who entered into the contract can recover for his personal loss as well as the loss of those for whom he formed the deal. The exemption for St Martins Property Another exception to contract privity appears in the commercial context. In such instances, the promisee (a party to the contract) is not required to demonstrate any loss in order to seek compensation for the loss of a third party. One typical example is when Party A hires Party B to conduct work on his property, and both Parties A and B realize that Party A will transfer the property to another party (Party C). If it is discovered after Party C has purchased the property that Party B's work for Party A was defective, Party A may sue Party B for Party C's loss, even if Party A has not experienced any damage. Specific performance This remedy is at the discretion of the court and may be available where damages would be insufficient. It can only be employed if the original contract's promisee is ready to enforce its rights under the contract. This means that it will only be suitable if the promisor has not yet fully executed its contractual responsibilities. Injunctions A promisee may be able to get an injunction to stop a promisor from doing what he agreed not to do. English Contract Law – Collateral Contract
When presented with a circumstance in which privity of contract suggests that a third party has no rights or remedies under a separate agreement between the promisee and the promisor, a supplementary contract (a collateral contract) between the third party and the promisor may be identified. A collateral contract bypasses the privity of contract theory by granting the person who is a third party under the other contract direct contractual rights against the promisor under a separate contract. Collateral contracts sometimes include scenarios in which a producer advertises the quality of a product and a client tells a contractor to purchase that product. When the contractor purchases the product, he enters into a contract with the manufacturer. However, it may be demonstrated that the client who instructs the contractor enters into a distinct contract with the producer. This separate contract is seen as the client approving the producer's promise of a high-quality product by instructing the contractor to purchase it, and it provides the customer with direct recourse against the producer under a separate (collateral) contract. English Contract Law - Agency
The law of agency allows one person to enter into an agreement on behalf of another. This means that if an agreement is reached between Parties A and B, but Party A acts as Party C's agent, the legal position is that Party A reached an agreement between Parties C and B. As a direct participant to the agreement (rather than a third party), Party C is entitled to the rights and remedies set forth in that agreement. The norms of agency may permit parties who are not signatories to agreements to rely on their limitation clauses. The agency structure is most commonly seen when the agent has an agreement in its own right with the promisor and also makes an arrangement for the third party and the promisor. This is usually done so that a third party can depend on a restriction clause in the agent-promisor agreement. For the agency structure to be functional, the following requirements must be met: It must be obvious in the principal agreement between the agent and the promisor that the limiting clause is designed to safeguard the third party. It must be apparent in the primary contract that the party to the main contract is acting not only on his own behalf, but also as the agent of the third party. The principal contracting party must have authorisation from the third party to serve as his agent. The third party must pay compensation to the main contracting party who agrees to restrict the third party's obligation. English Contract Law - Trusts Created By Contract
A contracting party can grant rights to a third party by naming oneself as trustee for the third party beneficiary. Such an arrangement will be ineffective unless the contract in question includes a trust declaration, which represents the necessity that the promisor be aware of the trust relationship. When third party rights are created through a declaration of trust, the promisee (who is a party to the contract) or the third party beneficiary can directly enforce the appropriate rights against the promisor. Any rights established for a third party through a trust arrangement are in addition to any rights established under the CRTPA 1999 (where applicable). English Contract Law – Capacity
You may be asked to decide whether a person has the mental ability to engage into a legally binding contract. This is significant because a person without ability may not be legally obligated by the agreement. The term 'capacity' refers to a person's ability to enter into and be bound by a contract. In terms of capacity, we shall discuss the following issues: mental impairment, intoxication, the capacity of minors, and the capacity of businesses. Insanity of the mind For a person to avoid being bound by a legally binding agreement due to mental incapacity, two tests must be met: the first is that the person must prove that he did not have mental capacity at the time he entered into the agreement; and the second is that the other party to the contract knew, or should have known, that this was the case. If both criteria are met, the contract is null and void. |
Kembara's Legal InfosInfos about legal issues and legal concepts that are available online . Archives
February 2023
Categories
All
|