Islamic Finance - regulations unique to each nation
When international regulating and standard-setting authorities publish pertinent rules and recommendations to support comparative best practices and enable international financial flows, the regulatory environments of the financial industry in many nations may converge. Due to the diverse strategies used by many nations in respect to Islamic financial institutions and services that meet various economic, social, and cultural needs of the financial community, the IFSI faces issues that are similar to these. Particularly, there are differences between jurisdictions in the laws, rules, and oversight of the financial industry. This is ascribed to the various legislative and regulatory histories of the various nations that either adopted a dual system that included both conventional and Islamic financial services, or a single system of Islamic financial services. The competition, growth, and sustainability of the system are significantly impacted by such a policy choice. Because the single system heavily depends on government regulations to mimic the sector, a lack of uniform regulations would hinder its expected expansion and viability. Both conventional and Islamic financial services run concurrently under the dual system. By implementing this system, the government is aiming to provide a stable and sound environment for both businesses while also recognizing the necessity for both traditional and Islamic participation. Addressing the rivalry, growth, and stability of both industries as well as those across industries would be a more difficult responsibility. The dual system has brought about variants of IFIs with various models. Only Islamic banks were initially permitted to operate in terms of license types given to IFIs. Later, Islamic windows were added to normal banks to entice conventional banks to compete in the IFSI. As a result of rising demand for conventional banks to provide extensive and sophisticated services, Islamic banks were established as affiliates of conventional banks. The standard lending model of conventional banks is modified in the beginning to enable Islamic banking by Islamic banks. Due to the development of trading and investment models, banks are now able to trade and share risks with both investors and their partners, their consumers. The dual system presents issues for the financial authority in terms of determining whether it is desirable to keep distinct laws with separate financial authorities or separate laws with a single financial authority. As several nations pass their own laws regulating Islamic financial institutions, as well as their goods and services, there are distinctions based on the country. However, these nations' monetary policies simultaneously apply to both systems. The nations under the spotlight were among the first to use Islamic money. The summary makes it easier to understand how different countries' regulatory and oversight systems have evolved since the establishment of Islamic financial institutions in each one. Due to its many innovative legislative initiatives and strategies, Malaysia assumes a leading position in the development of regulatory infrastructure and governance processes. The Islamic Banking Act was enacted by Malaysia's parliament in 1983 to legalize Islamic banking there. To avoid double taxation that would have resulted from the new banking idea, it also proposed revisions to the Stamp Duty Act and the Real Property Gains Tax in the same year. Malaysia also set the bar for the creation of the dual banking system by appropriately modifying the banking statute. More recently, significant changes to the Central Banking Act of Malaysia were enacted in order to formally establish the Central Bank of Malaysia's Shari'ah Advisory Council, ensuring effective Shari'ah governance. The financial authorities can ensure that the governing bodies of the institutions, such as the board of directors, the audit committee, the Shari'ah board, and the governance committee, would not only address the interests of investors and stakeholders but also instill confidence in the public and society through legislation, regulation, and supervision of the Islamic financial institutions. Malaysia has also released a number of guidelines for a tax neutrality policy to make Islamic financial products competitive with conventional goods in terms of tax liabilities, in addition to establishing new legislation to enable and enhance the operations of Islamic finance. The world of Islamic capital markets has seen similar trends. The Securities Commissions of Malaysia have issued the necessary regulations in this regard, including the first Islamic real estate investment trusts in contemporary times and regulations on Islamic securities, Islamic unit trusts, and even Islamic real estate investment trusts. Thus, the Malaysian experience has been used to inform the majority of efforts and strategies in the formulation of industrial policy.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorAnything you need to know about finance, money and business Archives
May 2023
Categories
All
|